<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Me, Myself and Mathematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Saurabh Joshi's Blog about math, algorithms, theorems, puzzles ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:22:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : Noodles by Pratik Poddar</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/puzzle-noodles/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Poddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-179</guid>
		<description>oops...
sorry..
didn&#039;t read the flawed solution..

Thanx You!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops&#8230;<br />
sorry..<br />
didn&#8217;t read the flawed solution..</p>
<p>Thanx You!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : Noodles by Pratik Poddar</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/puzzle-noodles/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Poddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Can someone find a mistake in my solution?

The problem is same as to calculate the following

If n vertices are identical
No. of ways to form one garland = 1
No. of ways to find more that one garland = x

Our answer = 1/x

x is no. of ways you can distribute n identical objects into more than 1 partition

x can be calculated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone find a mistake in my solution?</p>
<p>The problem is same as to calculate the following</p>
<p>If n vertices are identical<br />
No. of ways to form one garland = 1<br />
No. of ways to find more that one garland = x</p>
<p>Our answer = 1/x</p>
<p>x is no. of ways you can distribute n identical objects into more than 1 partition</p>
<p>x can be calculated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : Death Defying Duck!! by Pratik Poddar</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/puzzle-death-defying-duck/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Poddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Interesting puzzle (as always) !! :)
Thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting puzzle (as always) !! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : Goof ups by GOD by Pratik Poddar</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/puzzle-goof-ups-by-god/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Poddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Interesting solution...
Thanx for that...

Just a small observation.. ofcourse the solution by union find is great... but in case the number of assertions we make are really exhaustive, i.e. for n balls, i.e m approximately equal to mn(n+1)/2, we can do it in O(n^2), hence O(m) by using table filling algorithm {as used in many Theory of Computation Algorithms}... I hope I am correct... This algorithm is O($n^2$)... Whether this is better than O($m\alpha(n)$) is debatable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting solution&#8230;<br />
Thanx for that&#8230;</p>
<p>Just a small observation.. ofcourse the solution by union find is great&#8230; but in case the number of assertions we make are really exhaustive, i.e. for n balls, i.e m approximately equal to mn(n+1)/2, we can do it in O(n^2), hence O(m) by using table filling algorithm {as used in many Theory of Computation Algorithms}&#8230; I hope I am correct&#8230; This algorithm is O($n^2$)&#8230; Whether this is better than O($m\alpha(n)$) is debatable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : Goof ups by GOD by Jagadish</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/puzzle-goof-ups-by-god/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagadish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I think a more interesting question to ask is: if given m assertions can k of them be satisfied? 
Do you know an efficient way of doing this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a more interesting question to ask is: if given m assertions can k of them be satisfied?<br />
Do you know an efficient way of doing this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : 6 Prisoner and The matter of Life and Death by Pratik Poddar</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/puzzle-6-prisoner-and-the-matter-of-life-and-death/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Poddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=116#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Good puzzle....
:)

Keep it up...

Similar puzzle :)
http://pratikpoddarcse.blogspot.com/2009/08/puzzle-whats-number-on-my-hat.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good puzzle&#8230;.<br />
 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Keep it up&#8230;</p>
<p>Similar puzzle <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://pratikpoddarcse.blogspot.com/2009/08/puzzle-whats-number-on-my-hat.html" rel="nofollow">http://pratikpoddarcse.blogspot.com/2009/08/puzzle-whats-number-on-my-hat.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Largest sum sub-sequence and sub-matrix! by anonymus</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/largest-sum-sub-sequence-and-sub-matrix/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-169</guid>
		<description>after finding the sub_array[k] for each suck k rows we can use the solution of problem1 to find the maximum subvector in sub_array[k] by which we can know what are the rows(k2 and k5) in which the required elements lie ...
       p    q
    ---&#124;-----&#124;--
k2  --&#124;-----&#124;--
     --&#124;-----&#124;--
k5  --&#124;-----&#124;---


but we also need to find the columns(p,q) which will lead us to maximum subarray..

so for finding p and q should i maintain k*(p+q) variables or is there any method by which i can compute the same in less space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after finding the sub_array[k] for each suck k rows we can use the solution of problem1 to find the maximum subvector in sub_array[k] by which we can know what are the rows(k2 and k5) in which the required elements lie &#8230;<br />
       p    q<br />
    &#8212;|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8211;<br />
k2  &#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8211;<br />
     &#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8211;<br />
k5  &#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;</p>
<p>but we also need to find the columns(p,q) which will lead us to maximum subarray..</p>
<p>so for finding p and q should i maintain k*(p+q) variables or is there any method by which i can compute the same in less space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A problem in graph theory by Ranganath</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/a-problem-in-graph-theory/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranganath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hello Saurabh,

Your blog is really fantastic :-) I really liked many of the puzzles/questions here.

Good work,

Thanks for sharing the knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Saurabh,</p>
<p>Your blog is really fantastic <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I really liked many of the puzzles/questions here.</p>
<p>Good work,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzle : Death Defying Duck!! by Boris</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/puzzle-death-defying-duck/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing. I enjoy reading your blog; I visit it from time to time.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing. I enjoy reading your blog; I visit it from time to time.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cake Cutting Algorithms &#8211; 6 : Fair Convex Partitioning by Seyed Mohammad Sanaei</title>
		<link>http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/cake-cutting-algorithms-6-fair-convex-partitioning/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Seyed Mohammad Sanaei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbjoshi.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Dear Saurabh,
I am looking for proof of a theorem which says that equal partitioning is best when we are to decide the optimum values of independent variables of a convex function.
can you help me?
thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Saurabh,<br />
I am looking for proof of a theorem which says that equal partitioning is best when we are to decide the optimum values of independent variables of a convex function.<br />
can you help me?<br />
thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
